My father had a whole other family when I was a kid, so he wasn't around a lot. That, coupled with the virulent, anti-male social mannerisms, really put a hole in my upbringing and well being. For a long time I thought I was a nothing, a nobody, a loser, and a lot of it because I am a man. To this day, I don't know what helped me become "normal" again, but I can honestly say a LARGE portion of it was due to this site, and all of you great people here.

Today when I look at most women, I pity them. Nothing is more fulfilling to a woman than having and raising children. I'm not a woman and I can say this with 100% certainty. They try to fool themselves, but the laws of nature stand above those of humans. They have fooled themselves and men into believing this utter crap you see on TV and the media, that men are inferior. Their agenda was never noble, and today it has become enmeshed in a veil of disgusting debauchery. Think about it, giving the women the right to vote just increased the number of votes by about two. We all know that if a woman REALLY wanted to vote for someone, she could persuade her husband too, or at least make him SERIOUSLY think twice. We all know women have excellent powers of persuasion over men. Women and men are different, always were, and always will be. You can't judge a man and a woman by the same standards. You can be a single mom and raise kids, but just because you COULD do it doesn't mean you SHOULD do it. You can drive a car with your feet if you want to, that doesn't make it a good idea does it!?

Feminism almost ruined my life, and I'm sure it has ruined the lives of many men who have become AFCs because they just don't know any better, AFCs by default. Reminds me of the Matrix. Guys are in this fucked up Matrix right now, and this and similar sites are the keys to freedom. Still, I am hopeful and happy because I know that feminism will eventually eat itself. But, sadly, it seems this will not come without much grievance and suffering. You may think I am overdramatizing this, but let me assure you this piece of garbage feminism has brought more pain to my life than anything else I can think of. So much, that for a long time I hated all women, even though I didn't know why. Now I know why, because, without my knowledge, this ideology castrated me and left me emasculated.

I'm going to start helping all the guys I know out there to become more confident, to start being better people. The sad part is that we guys perpetuate it, but I don't know how much we can be blamed, because society programs us to think with our dicks than with our heads.

Masculine to me means strength, which means keeping the "snake in its cage." Women have historically always been the sex who have been unable to control their pleasures, not the other way around. That's what the masculine philosophy really means to me. Restraint.

It's about restraining yourself so that you become the hot commodity again, and not the girls. It's about having the girl when YOU want, not being always available so that she can have you when SHE wants.

In earlier times, men would work so hard that they would come back too tired to pleasure their wives, or oftentimes there were wars, where they were gone for months and years. In Egyptian and Greek and many other ancient civilizations, men who had sex too much were called weak and unable to control themselves. True strength comes from self-control. To "spill one's seed" extremely and constantly was also known as a quick way to one's death. Real men are climbing mountains and swimming in rivers, not cooking dinner! Today we have become so domesticated and so weak and horny that we gave the power of initiating sex to women on a platter.

It is so obvious that the sex who desires the other more will be subordinate to them. For a long time in history this was the woman. And that was fine, women didn't mind. Women trade power for love, men trade love for power. Woman all the time say they need to be "held," to be "used," etc. Man makes the house, woman makes the home. Today, men have become like rabid dogs because women walk around practically naked and with egos the size of cathedrals.

Is this so hard to understand for this greed infested morally bankrupt society?

(Note: This may be of value to single men and women who are frustrated or confused. It doesn't apply to people who are happily married.)

The biggest mistake a man can make is to put a woman on a pedestal and give her power over him.

Men, no less than women, are suckers for romance and sex. Romantic love is the ersatz religion of our neo-pagan era, a form of idolatry based on sexual infatuation. But no one is worthy of adoration. No one is perfect.

A man might benefit by regarding a woman as a means to an end rather than an end in herself. A man needs a woman to create a home and family, for companionship, sex, emotional and practical support, intimacy and you name it.

A "means to an end" may sound harsh to some. But in fact, nature designed women to make things happen. Mainly babies. My first girlfriend said, "I want to be used."

A man might think of a wife as a race driver thinks of his car, a cowboy his horse, a shepherd his dog, or a carpenter his tools. Men treasure what belongs to them, serve them well, and are true.

A woman expresses her love by her devotion to husband and children. She is loved for what she does, not for her sex appeal appearance. Women (and men) earn love by their deeds. This is the only permanent love worthy of respect.

The romantic model of male-female love, based on lust and idealization of beauty, does not work. A man who "looks up" to a woman is destined to remain a child. On the other hand, a woman wants to look up to her husband.

The feminist idea that women are "strong, creative, independent" persons loved for their repartee and sex appeal also doesn't work. People get bored and move on.

For a man to provide leadership to a woman is masculine; for a woman to accept that leadership is feminine. Of course, a man is going to consult his wife because one of his goals is to make her happy.

Beauty is skin deep. There is no correlation between beauty and intelligence or character. Women have used sex to control men from time immemorial but they want men they can't control.

A man might also abandon the notion that there is only one special woman for him. There are many women who will fit the bill. Finally, a man should not expect his lover or wife to think like him. As long as there is general agreement, he should respect her individuality.

"A MEANS TO AN END?"

Women are human beings worthy of the same dignity, respect and fulfillment as men.

I'm addressing the way men might really love, and how many women might really want to be loved.

Women are designed by nature to implement a man's vision and to be cherished for it. When a woman loves a man, often she wants to bear his children.

Sex is the symbol of a permanent relationship. No matter what "liberated" people say, sex is an act of possession and should be exclusive. We are all really looking for the intimacy trust and security that comes from a lifelong committment. This implies monogamy.

If you think this model of marriage is suspiciously like the old fashioned one, you are right. There is nothing wrong with it. It has been maligned and undermined by a sophisticated propaganda campaign designed to turn us into hetero-homosexuals, incapable of bonding with the opposite sex and having families.

The result is a growing population of isolated individuals who use promiscuity to assuage their loneliness. These people are easily controlled. See Aldous Huxley's prophetic novel, "Brave New World."

Women empower men by accepting their leadership. They emasculate them by challenging and criticizing them. This is the agenda of the kabalistic central bankers who control the mass media, education and government.

OUR HETEROPHOBIC SOCIETY

There has never been a war of aggression that hasn't been disguised as a war of defense. The war against heterosexual society (gender, marriage, family) is no exception, masquerading as the defense of women's and homosexual rights.

Our identity is based on gender. We develop in terms of our family roles as husbands and fathers, wives and mothers, sisters and brothers. An attack on gender is an attack on our identity.

Feminism tells women that marriage and family are instruments of oppression, and urges them to usurp the male role and abandon the feminine one. We also see this attack in the promotion of homosexuality/ gay marriage, in demands for genderless bathrooms, and birth control and sex vaccines for children.

Sexual promiscuity (a.k.a, the sexual revolution) is part of this attack. Promiscuous people are less able to form permanent marriages and stable families. Men who can get sex easily are less likely to marry.

What we are told is "progress" is really "progressive"only if you are a satanist.

In "Satan: Prince of this World" William Guy Carr wrote: "Satanists have always used sex bribery and the depravities and perversions of sex to obtain control of men and women they wished to use to further their diabolical conspiracy. Satanism makes a God of sex." (p. 37)

Pornography is used in war to undermine an enemy population by destroying family and morale. The Nazis spread porn in occupied Poland; the Israelis in the West Bank; the Americans in Iraq. We are drowning in porn and filth.

CASUAL SEX

Women haven't twigged to how self-destructive feminism and "sexual liberation" are. Young women are no longer valued as potential wives and mothers, but by how "hot" they are. They are pressured to have sex because other women will, and it is the only way to get male attention. There is nothing more demeaning to women (and men) than casual sex.

No wonder women suffer from low self-esteem. They want to be used for a higher purpose: as lovers, wives and mothers. They must demand evidence of love (patient courtship and marriage.) Otherwise they will be used and tossed away.

The separation of sex from love and procreation is degrading. It makes us view people as objects. It is the source of virtually all sexual perversion.

Sex, the ritual of marriage and procreation, creates a powerful bond between a man and a woman. It is a perversion to use it as diversion and entertainment.

We can fight the New World Order by restricting sex to courtship, love, marriage and procreation. We can resist the allure of sex by thinking in these terms. We can fight the New World Order by upholding the traditional heterosexual family.

A couple of days ago, when I entered my favorite online forum, I was puzzled to see a topic headline that said, "Women, Don't Get Married!" What is that? I asked myself. I knew many of the ladies who participated in the forum were happily married, others were still in search. Needless to say, I was surprised, but I decided to see what the chat really was about.

The author of that topic (a young woman, by the way), started with a description of what, in her opinion, was a typical housewife: a tired, ill-dressed, frustrated, uninteresting woman. Having children, she argued, doesn't leave enough free time so that a woman can take proper care of herself--and that includes daily visits to beauty salons, restaurants, and shopping centers (without which, of course, no happiness can exist!). Later, she referred to the well-known TV series "Sex and the City" as her ideal of a carefree, liberated lifestyle that suits a modern woman.

The rest of her arguments went like this:

1. If your career doesn't leave you quality time with your children, what's the point of having children (the assumption that a career is a top priority wasn't even discussed)?

2. A housewife suffers an inevitable process of mental and intellectual degradation.

3. Knowing only one man--one's husband--limits a woman's horizons. And anyway, since a woman can earn enough money to enjoy the previously mentioned lifestyle, a husband is nowadays useless.

I wasn't planning to enter the discussion at all, because that woman's post seemed so radical, so primitive and shallow, and I thought, Why waste my breath? What stopped me from walking away was, sadly, the tremendous amount of positive feedback she received from other surfers ("Bravo!", "Every word is truth," "I just got a divorce and I'm so happy"). The last straw was a comment that said: "A woman should get married while she's young, have a baby, give the baby to her parents or in-laws, develop a career while being supported by her husband, and when he runs out of finances, divorce him. Then she can meet other men, enjoy life, and sometimes spend a vacation with her child. This way, a woman has EVERYTHING!" The forum exploded with cheers.

I decided to post a reply. I wrote about the true values that were going to stay with us for as long as we live, unlike momentary pleasures. I wrote about children, who needed a real, loving family to grow up in. About God's will, who chose to make us women, loving and compassionate, so we can give that love to our family. I said that the desire to take without giving anything in return, and objectifying men by looking at them as a source of cash was an insult to a person's dignity. And good looks, I concluded, would count for nothing when a woman grows old and finds out she's all alone, unloved, unsatisfied, bitter.

The feeble voice of support I received was drowned in waves of replies that accused me of being old-fashioned, idealistic, unintelligent, "desperate to get married," and even "too young to understand what true happiness is about." Others called me to "taste the world's goods" before disregarding them.

This didn't make me angry, but I was bewildered. I went offline but was left with a lot of questions. How could it happen that grown women with a supposedly mature point of view aspire to a lifetime of superficial pleasures, vanity, submitting to their bodies' desires, and neglecting spiritual growth? How can a woman be so self-centered, instead of giving love and support to others? How can anybody substitute the true love, companionship, and care that can be found in marriage for simply using other people and moving on? Is this what women truly want?

I hope not. I hope I just came across a group of frustrated women who had unhappy personal lives. I chose not to say that, in my opinion, it was they--not the previously mentioned housewives!--who suffered degradation, emotional and spiritual. That it was they who had a distorted view of womanhood, family, and happiness. But it still makes me sad that these days a young woman receives a wave of vehemence when she dares to declare family is her top priority. It is sad that wanting to give unconditional love makes people smirk and say, "You don't know what life is about." This kind of lifestyle has been tried before and has failed miserably, as history clearly teaches us. Materialistic, consumer-oriented--let's just say it: selfish--cultures destroy themselves from within. Why be a part of that kind of "life" when there are long-term joys to be had by giving, sharing, sacrificing, and loving others?